<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MicroWiki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2006/04/04/microwiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2006/04/04/microwiki/</link>
	<description>Usability, IA, UX and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2006/04/04/microwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-7531</link>
		<dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherblog.com/Articles/2006/04/04/microwiki/#comment-7531</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I&#039;m quite spread out development-wise.  Aside from MicroWiki (and all of the other Micro* products, like MicroShop), I also do a substantial amount of WordPress coding.  You might not have noticed, but I recently moved RedAlt to a new server to improve performance.  I was also recently in Houston giving training on MicroWiki to a small company that is using it.  Plus I have a day job and a family and play video games on occasion.

I do realize that quick responses have become expected these days, but I can&#039;t figure out why anyone would think that reasonable.  It takes time to write a fix and test it.  I suspect that in many cases, software that people find acceptable because of the bug turnover rate are actually less tested than one would hope.  Hopefully not in this case.

If I&#039;ve read you right, I hope you enjoy your week off and that nobody gives you grief for not responding immediately while you&#039;re away.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I&#8217;m quite spread out development-wise.  Aside from MicroWiki (and all of the other Micro* products, like MicroShop), I also do a substantial amount of WordPress coding.  You might not have noticed, but I recently moved RedAlt to a new server to improve performance.  I was also recently in Houston giving training on MicroWiki to a small company that is using it.  Plus I have a day job and a family and play video games on occasion.</p>
<p>I do realize that quick responses have become expected these days, but I can&#8217;t figure out why anyone would think that reasonable.  It takes time to write a fix and test it.  I suspect that in many cases, software that people find acceptable because of the bug turnover rate are actually less tested than one would hope.  Hopefully not in this case.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;ve read you right, I hope you enjoy your week off and that nobody gives you grief for not responding immediately while you&#8217;re away.  <img src='http://www.theotherblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2006/04/04/microwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-7530</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherblog.com/Articles/2006/04/04/microwiki/#comment-7530</guid>
		<description>You have a life? I thought you said you were a developer... :-)

I&#039;m sorry Owen, but I was talking about this with a developer friend about how expectations have changed over the years... radically. Instead of submitting a bug report and forgetting about it... I&#039;m installing software before the developer has started coding it.

One of the main metrics for a piece of software is &quot;Brain turnover&quot;... if people aren&#039;t online within the last week, then it&#039;s a bit worring. That said, I&#039;m off for the week...

Thanks for the bug fix, it&#039;s much appreciated... which is mainly why I blogged (I couldn&#039;t find your email address anywhere)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a life? I thought you said you were a developer&#8230; <img src='http://www.theotherblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry Owen, but I was talking about this with a developer friend about how expectations have changed over the years&#8230; radically. Instead of submitting a bug report and forgetting about it&#8230; I&#8217;m installing software before the developer has started coding it.</p>
<p>One of the main metrics for a piece of software is &#8220;Brain turnover&#8221;&#8230; if people aren&#8217;t online within the last week, then it&#8217;s a bit worring. That said, I&#8217;m off for the week&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the bug fix, it&#8217;s much appreciated&#8230; which is mainly why I blogged (I couldn&#8217;t find your email address anywhere)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2006/04/04/microwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-7529</link>
		<dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 02:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherblog.com/Articles/2006/04/04/microwiki/#comment-7529</guid>
		<description>4 days?  There is one developer on this project - me - and I have a life outside of MicroWiki, so when I let the support questions accrue it&#039;s not because I&#039;m ignoring you, it&#039;s because I&#039;ll get to it when I get to it.  Your &quot;show stopper&quot; bugs are pretty trivial compared to the other things I happened to be doing when you needed to have a MicroWiki fix &lt;em&gt;right now&lt;/em&gt;.

Regardless of all that, version 2.0.2 is available for download, and it should fix at least the one issue you&#039;re talking about here.  As for the others, integration with WordPress in the method you described is not a priority for me, but I&#039;ll consider what you&#039;ve posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 days?  There is one developer on this project &#8211; me &#8211; and I have a life outside of MicroWiki, so when I let the support questions accrue it&#8217;s not because I&#8217;m ignoring you, it&#8217;s because I&#8217;ll get to it when I get to it.  Your &#8220;show stopper&#8221; bugs are pretty trivial compared to the other things I happened to be doing when you needed to have a MicroWiki fix <em>right now</em>.</p>
<p>Regardless of all that, version 2.0.2 is available for download, and it should fix at least the one issue you&#8217;re talking about here.  As for the others, integration with WordPress in the method you described is not a priority for me, but I&#8217;ll consider what you&#8217;ve posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

