<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If XML is so popular&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2007/03/14/if-xml-is-so-popular/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2007/03/14/if-xml-is-so-popular/</link>
	<description>Usability, IA, UX and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2007/03/14/if-xml-is-so-popular/comment-page-1/#comment-12468</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherblog.com/Articles/2007/03/14/if-xml-is-so-popular/#comment-12468</guid>
		<description>XML was/is a fab scam, I totally fell for the idea. Especially the DTD idea, where, before you start reading a file you can &quot;know&quot; whether or not that the data is what it is meant to be.

The &quot;best&quot; bit of XML, for me, is XMLRPC where I never ever touch the XML in python and just deal with things I&#039;m used to like strings, lists, dictonaries etc (regardless of what language I&#039;m using).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XML was/is a fab scam, I totally fell for the idea. Especially the DTD idea, where, before you start reading a file you can &#8220;know&#8221; whether or not that the data is what it is meant to be.</p>
<p>The &#8220;best&#8221; bit of XML, for me, is XMLRPC where I never ever touch the XML in python and just deal with things I&#8217;m used to like strings, lists, dictonaries etc (regardless of what language I&#8217;m using).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Small</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2007/03/14/if-xml-is-so-popular/comment-page-1/#comment-12453</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherblog.com/Articles/2007/03/14/if-xml-is-so-popular/#comment-12453</guid>
		<description>Here, here!  I can hardly read it, the machine can hardly parse it, what was the point again?

Remember when apps would publish the file formats in the Appendix?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, here!  I can hardly read it, the machine can hardly parse it, what was the point again?</p>
<p>Remember when apps would publish the file formats in the Appendix?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2007/03/14/if-xml-is-so-popular/comment-page-1/#comment-12386</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherblog.com/Articles/2007/03/14/if-xml-is-so-popular/#comment-12386</guid>
		<description>Not just you. XML is reaching a crisis point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just you. XML is reaching a crisis point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

