<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Are People Who Post Links In Twitter Thinking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2009/10/07/what-are-people-who-post-links-in-twitter-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2009/10/07/what-are-people-who-post-links-in-twitter-thinking/</link>
	<description>Usability, IA, UX and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2009/10/07/what-are-people-who-post-links-in-twitter-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-53325</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherblog.com/?p=4954#comment-53325</guid>
		<description>Oops, there are identical tweets for @imran and @ensembli in your screenshot simply because I forgot to switch accounts :$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, there are identical tweets for @imran and @ensembli in your screenshot simply because I forgot to switch accounts :$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispin</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2009/10/07/what-are-people-who-post-links-in-twitter-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-53299</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherblog.com/?p=4954#comment-53299</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pity the fool whose sense of humour is reliant entirely on existing witticisms&quot; - Mr. T

I feel your pain Tom, 

Today I followed a link on twitter to something that i had seen before ~ a blog post that contains, not a lot more than, a second hand picture (attributed at least), retweeted from popbitch that is also no doubt available in their mailout. 

almost impossible not to click though - even if you are 90% sure that it is that thing doing the rounds...

it was this if anyone is interested:
http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/today-was-a-good-day-flow-chart/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pity the fool whose sense of humour is reliant entirely on existing witticisms&#8221; &#8211; Mr. T</p>
<p>I feel your pain Tom, </p>
<p>Today I followed a link on twitter to something that i had seen before ~ a blog post that contains, not a lot more than, a second hand picture (attributed at least), retweeted from popbitch that is also no doubt available in their mailout. </p>
<p>almost impossible not to click though &#8211; even if you are 90% sure that it is that thing doing the rounds&#8230;</p>
<p>it was this if anyone is interested:<br />
<a href="http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/today-was-a-good-day-flow-chart/" rel="nofollow">http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/today-was-a-good-day-flow-chart/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2009/10/07/what-are-people-who-post-links-in-twitter-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-53295</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherblog.com/?p=4954#comment-53295</guid>
		<description>Guilty as charged, Tom. I tweet and retweet links all the time, and I think it&#039;s a good thing.

Unlike you, I find this practice to be one of the most useful things on Twitter. Let me explain why...

When I fire up my feed reader, more often than not I see 1000+ unread articles waiting for me. It&#039;s a heartsink and a chore that I put off, which only makes it worse when I finally do. In despair I frequently &quot;mark all as read&quot; and undoubtedly miss out on some interesting stuff. But even if I do spend the time looking through the ratio of interesting/irrelevant is poor. I guestimate that I read, at best, 1 in 50 posts.

When people post links on Twitter, however, the ratio is very different - maybe 1 in 15 links is interesting. This is because links posted on Twitter have been prefiltered by people I trust (if I didn&#039;t trust them I wouldn&#039;t follow them) so it&#039;s inevitable that they will be the best of the best articles / videos / jokes /news that are circulating.

And when a link is so good that it gets retweeted, that really is a sign of something worthwhile. The online equivalent of a double-distilled whisky (does that analogy work at all..?)

OK, so some jokes get tired, but isn&#039;t that just life? And at least on Twitter you have the ultimate control. It&#039;s called unfollow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guilty as charged, Tom. I tweet and retweet links all the time, and I think it&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
<p>Unlike you, I find this practice to be one of the most useful things on Twitter. Let me explain why&#8230;</p>
<p>When I fire up my feed reader, more often than not I see 1000+ unread articles waiting for me. It&#8217;s a heartsink and a chore that I put off, which only makes it worse when I finally do. In despair I frequently &#8220;mark all as read&#8221; and undoubtedly miss out on some interesting stuff. But even if I do spend the time looking through the ratio of interesting/irrelevant is poor. I guestimate that I read, at best, 1 in 50 posts.</p>
<p>When people post links on Twitter, however, the ratio is very different &#8211; maybe 1 in 15 links is interesting. This is because links posted on Twitter have been prefiltered by people I trust (if I didn&#8217;t trust them I wouldn&#8217;t follow them) so it&#8217;s inevitable that they will be the best of the best articles / videos / jokes /news that are circulating.</p>
<p>And when a link is so good that it gets retweeted, that really is a sign of something worthwhile. The online equivalent of a double-distilled whisky (does that analogy work at all..?)</p>
<p>OK, so some jokes get tired, but isn&#8217;t that just life? And at least on Twitter you have the ultimate control. It&#8217;s called unfollow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2009/10/07/what-are-people-who-post-links-in-twitter-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-53294</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherblog.com/?p=4954#comment-53294</guid>
		<description>testing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>testing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

